Quick Reads

Sacudiendo el barco: La expedición de J.Craig Venter para recolectar microbios, severamente cuestionada en Latinoamérica

Submitted by ETC Staff on

Organizaciones de la sociedad civil y movimientos sociales que se reunirán en el Primer Foro Social de las Américas, en Quito, Ecuador, del 25 al 30 de julio 2004, protestan contra la expedición de J. Craig Venter, financiada por el gobierno de Estados Unidos, para recolectar y secuenciar diversidad microbiana de todo el mundo. Los microbios exóticos son materia prima para crear nuevas fuentes de energía e incluso nuevas formas de vida.

Rocking the Boat: J. Craig Venter's Microbial Collecting Expedition Under Fire in Latin America

Submitted by ETC Staff on

Civil society organizations (CSOs) and peoples’ movements convening at the first Americas Social Forum in Quito, Ecuador, July 25-30 2004, are protesting J. Craig Venter’s US-government funded ocean expedition to collect and sequence microbial diversity from around the globe. Exotic microbes are the raw materials for creating new energy sources and even new life forms.

Enola Patent Ruled Invalid: Haven’t we Bean here before? (Yes, yes, yes, yes and yes.)

Submitted by ETC Group on

On July 10, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that U.S. patent 5,894,079 (the “Enola” bean patent), which claims a yellow bean of Mexican origin, is invalid because none of the patent claims meet the criterion of non-obviousness. The case has been closely watched by civil society groups concerned about biopiracy, the patenting of life and the corporate control of food production.

The Precautionary Prince II

Submitted by ETC Staff on

Prince Charles’ cautionary note brings “control and ownership” of nanotechnology, social issues and impacts on the South to the fore

“Prince Charles’ thoughtful article in the Independent on Sunday (UK) is an impressive service to society and science in the unfolding public debate on nanotechnology,” according to Jim Thomas of the ETC Group’s Oxford office. “Not only does the Prince set aside the fictional notion of ‘grey goo,’ but he also sensibly reminds us that there are important unanswered questions relating to the control and ownership of these technologies,” said Thomas.

Plaga Gris vs Plaga Verde. ¿Cuáles son los verdaderos peligros en el desarrollo de la nanotecnología?

Submitted by ETC Staff on

El Príncipe Carlos pone el énfasis en quiénes son los que la controlan

"El artículo del Príncipe Carlos en The Independent on Sunday (11.07.2004, Reino Unido) muestra gran preocupación por las implicaciones que tiene la nanoteconlogía para la sociedad y la ciencia", enfatiza Jim Thomas de la oficina del Grupo ETC en Oxford. "El Príncipe no solo se aparta de la idea fantasiosa de la 'Plaga Gris' sino que nos recuerda que existen cuestiones muy importantes que aún no se resuelven, como quiénes son los propietarios y quiénes controlan esas tecnologías."

Nanotech: Unpredictable and Un-Regulated

Submitted by ETC Staff on

The ETC Group releases a new Communiqué today (08.07.2004) that provides an update on policy discussions related to nanotech health and safety issues and the glaring lack of regulatory oversight. According to the ETC Group, governments on both sides of the Atlantic are reluctantly and belatedly conceding that current safety and health regulations may not be adequate to address the special exigencies of nano-scale materials. In sharp contrast to the political climate one year ago, the potential health and environmental risks of some nano-scale technologies are being openly discussed in Europe and North America. Since mid-2002, ETC Group has called for a moratorium on the use of synthetic nanoparticles in the lab and in any new commercial products until governments adopt "best practices" for research.

Sigilosa reunión de 26 gobiernos sobre nanotecnología

Submitted by ETC Staff on

El 17 y 18 de junio 2004 se llevó a cabo en Washington un primer diálogo intergubernamental sobre investigación y desarrollo responsable de la nanotecnología ("Responsible Research and Development of Nanotechnology") con representantes de 26 países. En sus palabras de bienvenida, Mike Roco, de la Fundación Nacional para la Ciencia de Estados Unidos explicó que la reunión abordó las amplias implicaciones sociales que no pueden ser tratadas por los países de manera individual. El cuestionamiento principal de Roco fue: "¿cómo podemos preparar nuestro mundo para la emergencia de la nanotecnología?"

26 Governments Tiptoe Toward Global Nano Governance

Submitted by ETC Staff on

Grey-Goovernance?

On June 17-18 2010, a first intergovernmental dialogue on “Responsible Research and Development of Nanotechnology” convened in Washington with representatives from 26 countries. In his introductory remarks, Mike Roco of the US government’s National Science Foundation explained that the meeting was dedicated to the examination of broad societal issues that cannot be addressed by any single country. Roco asked: “How can we prepare our world for the emergence of nanotechnology?”

26 Governments Tiptoe Toward Global Nano Governance: Grey Goovernance?

Submitted by ETC Staff on

On June 17-18 2004, a first intergovernmental dialogue on "Responsible Research and Development of Nanotechnology" convened in Washington with representatives from 26 countries. In his introductory remarks, Mike Roco of the US government’s National Science Foundation explained that the meeting was dedicated to the examination of broad societal issues that cannot be addressed by any single country. Roco asked: "How can we prepare our world for the emergence of nanotechnology?"

Message to FAO: "Fight Hunger - Not Farmers"

Submitted by ETC Staff on

UN Agency's report incompetent, illogical and ill-willed, say more than 650 civil society organizations in Open Letter

More than 650 civil society organisations (NGOs and social movements) and 800 individuals from 83 countries delivered an open letter to Jacques Diouf, Director-General of the Rome-based UN agency today condemning FAO's incompetence in addressing scientific and technical issues related to genetically- engineered crops and questioning the agency's integrity in relating to the world's smallholder farmers. Among the signatories are national and international farmers' organisations, scientists, and literally hundreds of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) some of whom have had formal consultative status with FAO for decades. The letter was hand-delivered to FAO on behalf of its signatories Wednesday morning by Antonio Onorati, who chaired the umbrella body that worked with FAO and its member governments for the World Food Summits of 1996 and 2002.

Pages